the film
forum
library
tutorial
contact
Economic and dam related articles

Study: Removing Snake River Dams
Would Cost Economy, Environment

by Matthew Weaver
Capital Press, January 7, 2020

A Tidewater barge is loaded with grain at the Lewis Clark Terminal at the Port of Lewiston on Monday. A study funded by the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association indicates breaching Snake River dams would increase regional transportation costs by $2.3 billion over the next 30 years. (Pete Caster photo) A new study finds that the costs to farmers and the region's economy if the four dams on the lower Snake River were removed would average roughly $76 million a year.

That equals as much as $2.3 billion over the next 30 years, according to the study, which was commissioned by the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association.

Some of the estimated costs are in the form of higher expenses for farmers and others would be for building and maintaining roads, railroad facilities and storage facilities. The overall impact on the region's economy is also factored in.

"Rather than an opinion poll, this study relies on existing data...," association executive director Kristin Meira told the Capital Press.

The association commissioned economic consultants FCS Group to develop the study to offset misinformation about the value of the Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite dams to the region's economy.

The association wanted to provide a full picture of the impacts that would be felt if the dams were removed, particularly in the transportation sector, Meira said.

The study doesn't include the cost of breaching the dams.

Information in the study comes from government agencies, commodity commissions and ports.

"We don't create new data here," Meira said. "We simply evaluate the data and determine what it means for the Northwest if the dams were to be removed. ... This is actual data with regard to the value of commodities that move and how much transportation costs."

According to the study:

Barges produce fewer emissions than any other form of cargo transportation, Meira said. The association found the carbon impacts of shifting to trucks and rail "pretty stark."

"It's hard to picture being concerned with climate change and being in favor of dam breaching — they just don't go together," she said.

Idaho Wheat Commission board member Joseph Anderson, of Genesee, said in a statement that he would share the study's results during a workshop in Clarkston, Wash.

The public can comment until Jan. 24 on a draft stakeholder report on dam breaching funded by Washington Gov. Jay Inslee's office and the legislature.

"As this study shows, the Snake River dam system is the most efficient option for transporting goods such as wheat, generating renewable energy via hydropower and preventing flooding in the Pacific Northwest," Anderson said. "While removing or breaching the Snake River dams will not increase salmon numbers with any certainty, there would definitely be negative impacts on people, including growers."

The waterways association's report will be part of the information provided to the governor along with the stakeholder report, said Tara Lee, deputy director of communications for Inslee's office.

Meira said the association hasn't found any upside to removing the dams, related to either the environment, transportation efficiency or safety.

"We haven't identified any net benefit to removing the dams," she said.


Matthew Weaver
Study: Removing Snake River Dams Would Cost Economy, Environment
Capital Press, January 7, 2020

See what you can learn

learn more on topics covered in the film
see the video
read the script
learn the songs
discussion forum
salmon animation