the film forum library tutorial contact

Grays Harbor PUD Commissioners Support Dams on Lower Snake River by Staff KXRO News, June 5, 2019

"To remove those dams would be a shortsighted error, driven by emotion rather than the facts."
(bluefish has reached out to BPA for details of the January 2017 day of energy shortage, but has yet to hear a worthwhile response.)

Aberdeen, WA -- The Grays Harbor PUD Board of Commissioners have put their support behind the four hydroelectric dams on Eastern Washington's Lower Snake River.

The PUD says that the commissioners passed a resolution highlighting the dams value to the environment and economy of the Pacific Northwest.

On Monday, the board unanimously approved the resolution firmly stating that the "removal of elements of the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS), including the Lower Snake River Dams would negatively impact the Grays Harbor Public Utility District's responsibility to provide reliable, efficient, clean and affordable power to its customers."

"Removing the Lower Snake Dams is bad for the county and the region. Locally they mean efficient energy at an affordable cost and greater energy reliability for Grays Harbor PUD customers," said PUD Board President Russ Skolrood. "But to the region, especially Eastern Washington and the Columbia River Gorge, the impacts are even greater. They impact the lives of thousands of families through irrigation, flood control, navigable waterways and outdoor recreation."

PUD Board Secretary Dave Timmons says that without the energy generated by the dams, the reliable flow of energy from the FCRPS would be threatened, a fact illustrated by a 2017 report from the Bonneville Power Administration.

"In January of 2017, when thousands of households across the Northwest needed power to stay warm, the output from wind generators varied from 3000 to 74 megawatts. Those are not numbers you can plan on to reliably power homes and businesses. At that same time, the Lower Snake Dams were generating nearly 1300 megawatts. To me that shows that one source can be counted on, the other can't," said Timmons.

The PUD says "proponents of dam removal often cite the impact the dams have on the salmon runs that Puget Sound orca pods rely on for survival."

PUD Board Vice President Arie Callaghan says numerous studies dispute that claim.

"Operators of hydroelectric facilities spend billions of dollars on programs to allow dams to coexist with the environment. Those programs have made a real difference, which shows me those dams and salmon can coexist," said Callaghan. "To remove those dams would be a shortsighted error, driven by emotion rather than the facts."

According to the PUD, studies carried out by several groups including NOAA Fisheries and the Environmental Protection Agency have shown that predation, ocean conditions, pollution and other factors have greater, far reaching effects on salmon over their lifespan than the relatively brief period they spend around hydroelectric dams.

The board's resolution also highlighted the irony that comes from the State Legislature passing a bill calling for a 100% emissions free power system, while at the same time environmental groups are seeking to dismantle parts of the infrastructure that make it possible.

"Washington is leading the way in clean energy because of hydro power and yet there are those who would seek to cut the knees out of that system," said Skolrood. "That makes no sense to me. We have made huge strides toward a 100% clean energy industry. Why in the world would we want to start moving backwards?"