the film
forum
library
tutorial
contact
Economic and dam related articles

'Just bashing California does not a Northwest energy policy make'

by Joel Connelly
Seattle Post-Intelligencer, March 14, 2001

A friend downtown passed on a tongue-in-cheek ultimatum, supposedly sent by the 30 million energy-guzzling potential invaders of the Northwest poised south of the Siskiyous.

"Washington State Residents:

"Wednesday's earthquake was just a warning.

"Now that we have your attention, sell us your power, give us back our sunshine and take back your rain, and we'll take back our earthquakes."

(signed) The People of California.

Up here in lotus land, populace and politicians have looked upon California kind of like we had Iraq for a neighbor. Our leaders have drawn up water and energy scenarios that resemble the 1960s Domino Theory advanced by the Pentagon, which argued that China's hordes would overrun Southeast Asia if the United States did not stand fast in Vietnam.

Last week, I heard a stirring of common sense. "Just bashing California does not a Northwest energy policy make," said freshman Rep. Rick Larsen, D-Wash.

He's right. Myths will not solve shortages. Subject to close scrutiny, today's demonizing of California stands up about as well as the Domino Theory.

California has not been draining us dry during its winter power shortage, as evidenced by a little-seen Bonneville Power Administration announcement earlier this month.

"Based on the two-for-one exchange agreement, BPA has received over 323,000 megawatt-hours more electricity back from California than it sent since November of last year," the agency reported. "This added power is enough to energize Seattle for 12 days."

By getting a second megawatt for every one sent, the BPA added, Bonneville was able to run less water through dams to generate power, and keep water in reservoirs.

Nor are the Californians waiting out their power shortage in hot tubs, or in floodlit shopping centers.

Department of Energy statistics show that the Golden State ranks 47th in the nation in per capita electricity consumption. California businesses and consumers slashed energy use by 8 percent in February over last year. (Seattle's power use is down by about 6 percent) The saving in California amounted to 2,578 megawatts: One megawatt is enough electricity to meet the needs of about 1,000 homes.

California bashers ignore a fact that can be seen by driving 25 miles outside of downtown Seattle in any direction. The entire West is growing and hooking onto the power grid.

"We hear about all those hot tubbers. Well, the rate of demand growth in California during the 1990s was half the national average: 85 percent of the increased demand on the grid has occurred in states outside of California," said Ralph Cavanagh, staff attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Starting tomorrow, retail businesses in California will be required to reduce unnecessary lighting after business hours. The California Highway Patrol, sheriffs and local police will enforce the order.

Efforts under way in California make me take the argument a step further: As the Northwest braces for the second-worst snowpack runoff on record, California ought to serve as an example to its northern neighbor.

The Golden State is ahead of us in curtailment of energy use, and putting in place long-term measures to encourage conservation and renewable energy resources.

Going nowhere in the Washington Legislature is legislation that would require utilities to invest 3 percent of their revenues in energy conservation, low-income weatherization and low-income energy help.

"California has already put into place serious investment in energy conservation," said Sara Patton, executive director of the Northwest Energy Coalition. "Utilities are required to invest a certain percentage of their revenues in conservation and renewable energy resources. Oregon has it. Montana has it. Nineteen states have it. Even Texas has it."

There is a persuasive argument against writing a conservation requirement into law: The marketplace is already doing the job.

"My members are seeing the impact of rising energy costs and they don't need any additional motivation to work on efficiency," Ken Canon, executive director of Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities, told a Seattle City Club forum.

What happens, however, if the price of power goes back down? The tendency has been to cut back on cutting kilowatts.

In the latter part of the 1990s, with electricity plentiful, the Bonneville Power Administration virtually dismantled a $200-million-a-year energy conservation program. Many utilities followed suit. Seattle City Light was virtually alone in keeping its conservation investment, which has saved ratepayers millions of dollars in power purchases this winter.

The uncomfortable fact is that the Pacific Northwest faces an energy crisis of its own making.

"It is shaping up as the power equivalent of the Perfect Storm," Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., said last week. "We are having our driest years in history. We curtailed our energy conservation programs. We don't have the water in our reservoirs to flush the fish downstream. California is still likely to be short of power."

A power-desperate California did push up our electricity bills this winter, with, in all likelihood, a healthy dose of anti-competitive conniving by Texas-based energy suppliers.

Blame wastes time, and cooperation would make a trio of needed tasks lots easier:

"This is going to be a summer of appeals, up and down the Western power grid, for a commitment to less power use: We are not dealing with a California crisis or a Northwest shortage, this is a West-wide problem," Cavanagh said.


P-I columnist Joel Connelly
'Just bashing California does not a Northwest energy policy make'
Seattle Post-Intelligencer, March 14, 2001

See what you can learn

learn more on topics covered in the film
see the video
read the script
learn the songs
discussion forum
salmon animation