the film
Commentaries and editorials

Trump's Budget on BPA
Goes from Bad to Worse

by Scott Corwin
The Oregonian, February 19, 2018

(Bonneville Power Administration) Power transmission line near Bonneville Dam After facing rejection by Congress in last year's budget process, President Trump doubled down last week with another attempt to sell off the electricity transmission assets of the Bonneville Power Administration and other power marketing agencies. Not only is the asset sale back again, but the president's fiscal year 2019 budget adds the equally harmful notion of raising money for the federal budget by changing the power rates charged by the Bonneville Power Administration.

The response from Congress to these misguided notions should be no and no.

While wrapped in the veneer of privatization, the president's budget proposals would have the ironic effect of harming private enterprise in the Northwest by raising costs. It is difficult to view these proposals as anything but a selective regional tax that would transfer wealth from businesses and residents in the Northwest to feed the unquenchable federal budget.

Northwest businesses operate in highly competitive global markets. Any increase in major inputs, such as power costs, directly pressures profitability and employment. Raising energy costs for business and industry is not the path to economic prosperity. And, raising electricity rates on families simply reduces disposable income and stifles consumer spending, savings and investment.

To be clear, rejecting these proposals should not mean that Bonneville can avoid some change. The Bonneville Power Administration doesn't receive any taxpayer support, and is funded completely by revenue from customers. There may be further potential for customer-financing of Bonneville projects in the future. The power agency serves an important role marketing mostly carbon-free power from 31 dams and one nuclear plant, and operating the 300 substations and 15,000 miles of transmission lines that form the backbone of the Northwest electricity system. It is a utility in transition that needs to work with the agencies that own the generation projects (the Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation and Energy Northwest) to bring additional efficiency, stability and value for its customers if it is to compete in a quickly evolving industry.

The federal budget proposal to grab $5 billion from the Northwest by selling Bonneville's electricity transmission system to private investors would create a loss of regional control and value, would increase costs to consumers and could harm service to remote areas in the region that might be a lower priority to an outside interest. It's estimated that transmission rates would need to increase by more than 40 percent when a new owner seeks to recover the costs of purchasing a system that already has been largely paid for by citizens of the region.

The proposal to artificially raise Bonneville's wholesale power rates is similarly harmful. Northwest customers already pay all of the costs associated with generating and delivering the power from federal generation. By law, Bonneville Power Administration rates are set to fully recover any government investment (principal and interest) and to provide the region with reliable, renewable electricity. Increases in the agency's rates to fund the federal budget would directly affect the pocketbooks of residents and the vitality of businesses without any benefit in return.

There's even some question as to whether the proposals would actually raise the intended revenue or would merely lead to endless time and money spent on litigation. Changes to Bonneville's rate-setting standard require a change in law and would still be subject to legal challenge since the agency's current power contracts expressly provide for rates based on the actual costs of the power. And, the mere act of exploring divestiture of Bonneville Power Administration assets is illegal under a law passed in 1986. Then Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee Mark O. Hatfield included this provision to try to save the region from just these kinds of endlessly repeating budget threats.

To their credit, a bipartisan group of 13 Northwest members of the House of Representatives sent a letter to the White House Office of Management and Budget to ask them to desist - even before the proposals came out this year. Northwest Senators have opposed these proposals as well. This broadly bipartisan opposition has been very effective in getting past proposals stopped in their tracks. Still, there is always a concern that strange things can happen in the dead of night when budget deals come together behind closed doors.

Selling off the Bonneville Power Administration transmission system and imposing a new rate structure to feed the federal budget would harm the private businesses and residents who have paid to create and maintain this incredible Columbia River hydropower system. Here's to hoping these proposals are hastened to a timely demise once again.

Related Pages:
Wyden on Energy Department Nominee -- Selling Off Bonneville Power is a Nonstarter by Staff, My Central Oregon, 6/6/17
BPA Grid Sale Tied to Fantasy Budget by Editorial Board, Spokesman-Review, 6/7/17
21 U.S. Senators Blast Trump Proposal to Sell BPA Power Grid by Staff, Seattle Times, 6/8/17
Northwest Lawmakers Oppose Selling BPA Transmission Lines by Dameon Pesanti, The Columbian, 6/6/17
Politicians Oppose Privatization of Bonneville Power Administration by News Sources, KOBI 5, 6/5/17
NW Lawmakers Urge President Trump: Don't Sell Off BPA Assets by News Sources, KTVZ, 6/5/17

Scott Corwin is executive director of the Public Power Council representing consumer-owned utilities throughout the northwest. He lives in Southwest Portland.
Trump's Budget on BPA Goes from Bad to Worse
The Oregonian, February 19, 2018

See what you can learn

learn more on topics covered in the film
see the video
read the script
learn the songs
discussion forum
salmon animation